I liked this quote from her statement about the show:
“I am interested in isolating the spatial quirks and ambiguities that I find so compelling in painting, and understanding how these can be experienced as forms that inhabit our space. I am also interested in how the strong, localized color of the plastics I use can be made to behave more lithely through optical mixture of stripes and through the overlay of transparent shadows as the forms bend in space. “
i agree with carla regarding that “umph,” especially with “dog watch” and “somersault”. there are a few artists out there who make me jealous… wanting to try my hand at what they’re doing (one of the primary motivations behind wanting to be a painter, no?). martha is one of them.
I’m digging these, too. They remind me of certain of the spaces in much older painting (Giotto comes to mind) – like if you were to build in 3D what the 2D appears to be.
I liked this quote from her statement about the show:
“I am interested in isolating the spatial quirks and ambiguities that I find so compelling in painting, and understanding how these can be experienced as forms that inhabit our space. I am also interested in how the strong, localized color of the plastics I use can be made to behave more lithely through optical mixture of stripes and through the overlay of transparent shadows as the forms bend in space. “
She’s working in interesting territory. These really do have the visual/guttural “umph” one experiences with painting.
i agree with carla regarding that “umph,” especially with “dog watch” and “somersault”. there are a few artists out there who make me jealous… wanting to try my hand at what they’re doing (one of the primary motivations behind wanting to be a painter, no?). martha is one of them.
I’m digging these, too. They remind me of certain of the spaces in much older painting (Giotto comes to mind) – like if you were to build in 3D what the 2D appears to be.
someone to cross reference with macleish:
tamara zahaykevich